From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8179: 24.0.50; vc thinks that SVN takes care of all my files Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:15:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299620233 8462 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2011 21:37:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8179@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 22:37:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4aZ-0005hU-7Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:37:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px4aY-0000eb-KY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38910 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px4aQ-0000eA-KM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4aP-0007uy-EA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4aP-0007uu-B7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4GC-0006Cg-94; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:16:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:16:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8179.129961893123788 (code B ref 8179); Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:16:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2011 21:15:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4Fe-0006Bd-Ko for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:15:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4Fc-0006BQ-9K for 8179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p28LFJbc014999; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5B2971300D7; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:15:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:50:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3735=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:16:04 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44799 Archived-At: >> vc should instead look at what the "closest" vc in use is. > For some reason, it doesn't do it that way. That does seem to make more > sense on the face of it. I imagine this must have been discussed before > somewhere... The current behaviour is documented in the manual. It was somewhat discussed, but not at length. It's mostly a feature of the implementation, rather than by design. Stefan