From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9571: 24.0.50; user option to turn off bidi, please Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:31:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316694771 12755 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2011 12:32:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9571@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 14:32:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iSM-0002fa-MK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:32:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55106 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iSM-0005H8-3c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iSJ-0005Gz-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iSI-0002uf-S6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iSI-0002ua-Nc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iSc-00087o-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9571 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 9571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9571.131669472731168 (code B ref 9571); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2011 12:32:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iRj-00086e-0G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6iRg-00086V-Tm for 9571@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:05 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EACoqe05FpZ7x/2dsb2JhbABCp395gVMBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIC7UThn0EoFiEQw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,423,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="137860539" Original-Received: from 69-165-158-241.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.158.241]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Sep 2011 08:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AFEE659234; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:31:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:18:46 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:33:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51663 Archived-At: > 1. That's not very user-friendly. We should have a user option that > does this, i.e., gives users an easy way to disable this feature if they > don't want to use it. Why would we need an option for that other than for debugging purposes? Stefan