From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11707: 24.1.50; 'make recompile' does not use BYTE_COMPILE_FLAGS on Windows Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120614111657.0E2E52C803A@msa105.auone-net.jp> <83haudyi35.fsf@gnu.org> <20120615164131.1F1FE2C037@msa104.auone-net.jp> <83fw9wfp6y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340907125 16411 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2012 18:12:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11707@debbugs.gnu.org, Kazuhiro Ito To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 20:12:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJC9-00088u-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:11:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJC9-0007P4-7s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJC6-0007Od-1f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJC1-0003CN-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJC1-0003CG-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJG5-0001yz-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11707 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11707-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11707.13409073387585 (code B ref 11707); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11707) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 18:15:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJFi-0001yI-8P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:34578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJFh-0001yC-5V for 11707@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5SIB8N0012256; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7243FB4161; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:11:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:34:39 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4264=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4264> : streams <775694> : uri <1151735> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61382 Archived-At: >> Actually, I don't know of any case where it ends up generating incorrect >> byte-code. It will signal different (fewer) warnings and things like >> that, but AFAIK the generated byte-code should be pretty much >> equivalent. > True. Though there's the "invalid byte code" issue with > byte-compile-dynamic that was noticed recently. That's an extra, > somewhat serious looking warning that it signals. Good point. Tho I tend to count it against byte-compile-dynamic, which is a feature I'd be happy to stop supporting. Stefan