From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:26:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <86lez73auf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24060"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 51883@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, eliz@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 22 22:27:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNuv-00064S-3L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 22:27:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNut-00089k-25 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:27:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNuZ-000885-46 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:27:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNuY-0001bJ-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNuY-0007GR-KN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, "Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" , Gregory Heytings , Eli Zaretskii , 51883@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.164288677327859 (code B ref 51883); Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2022 21:26:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNtl-0007FB-96 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBNtk-0007Ep-8l for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04D538049E; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:26:06 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B1FC080443; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:26:04 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642886764; bh=r0RMPnsJFYLEXJfi7JTAs2LCosErhEwhcBlZ5Ux0YwU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=U85jGXIHOEZEJvhPvD4CotE7pbE2qy0h72MaMFh2T+KvRHx7U2Fh8Muyr52F1v/nP SZCoAoNCVUMPss75HEtAOov0ueDN/s59HWmaxixqr8uiCTB3OaXjvmvppTJL0H3lHD FwEgeJUeu1sFlbPcW3p3SDEByCZFz1+k+BekjT/cPWOnpj5g27B6kfBLOs83xra9tp ydMSqfwyI7gvFZhvWCZ7fN6Rd/bYg+jL9IuBHCbPfVVDKfES+yg8xuW1RF5JArRVd1 azPNXqsuh+W7HgC64GTVoVGKzIAiGrZSmajky77jSropdFITV7x/IDPy+1YyKooHuR 6maf7eLuCP8Bg== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 495D61207CE; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 16:26:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86lez73auf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:08:12 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224865 Archived-At: >> IIUC framesets are designed to be serializable so they shouldn't hold on >> to external data like buffers and windows, so such 16 elements should >> cost very little in terms of heap use. > OTOH, since framesets are designed to be serializable, isn't it > overkill to use framesets in the same session? Not sure what you mean by "overkill". AFAIK it makes them more lightweight. > For example, `clone-frame` doesn't use framesets, and the effect of > `clone-frame` should be the same as what `undelete-frame` does. Except it actually creates a frame, so it requires a lot more resources. Stefan