From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Cc: "Gerd Möllmann" <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>, 65516@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65516: 30.0.50; Edebug behavior of signaling errors in &or
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 23:26:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvwmxf502e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878r9w8548.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:58:31 +0200")
Michael Heerdegen [2023-08-28 00:58:31] wrote:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Hmm... actually, looking at `def-form` again it seems it doesn't use
>> `&define` nor `(edebug-)gate`.
> Dunno if this helps, I'm understanding it only half, but AFAIU,
> `def-form` falls back to `edebug-form' which looks at &define and uses
> `edebug-gate' indirectly when calling `edebug-list-form'.
Hmm... Could be, indeed. In any case, this "gate" business is
quite messy.
I'd be tempted to start removing uses of it, bit by bit, to try and see
what breaks. And if needed, maybe add a new replacement for it that
would be better defined (I'm imagining a kind of "scoped gate", which
could look like `[&gate-in ... [&gate-lock ...SPECS...] ...]` such
that if `...SPECS...` fails to match, we propagate this failure
immediately up to the `gate-in`).
This way
[&gate-in [&or ["foo" &gate-lock ...]
["foo" "bar"]]]
would never fallback to ["foo" "bar"] whereas
[&or [&gate-in ["foo" &gate-lock ...]]
["foo" "bar"]]]
would fallback to ["foo" "bar"] if "..." fails to match.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-28 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 6:28 bug#65516: 30.0.50; Edebug behavior of signaling errors in &or Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-26 12:04 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-26 20:39 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-27 6:26 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-27 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-28 5:44 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-28 12:42 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-29 7:07 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-29 15:35 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-30 5:11 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-27 15:32 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-27 22:58 ` Michael Heerdegen
2023-08-28 3:26 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2023-08-28 5:52 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-08-28 5:44 ` Gerd Möllmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvwmxf502e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=65516@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).