From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11182: 24.0.93; In *shell* buffer, '?' can't be inserted after TAB. Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:10:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333635117 27283 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2012 14:11:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11182@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 16:11:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPm-0003kW-UG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:11:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35106 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPk-0003Dx-2C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPY-00037x-RD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:11:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPO-0008AG-2R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPN-00089r-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPt-0002tT-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11182 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11182-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11182.133363508211077 (code B ref 11182); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2012 14:11:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPG-0002sc-Fu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:11:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:51759) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFnPA-0002sQ-WE for 11182@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:11:21 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9FpZV7/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="172282062" Original-Received: from 69-165-149-123.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.149.123]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Apr 2012 10:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C8BBB59339; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:10:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:04:27 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58528 Archived-At: > This is with the latest trunk emacs. > In *shell* buffer, if I have files temp1, temp2, temp.txt, > and type as this ( means the TAB key): > % rm temp > *Completions* buffer pops up and lists temp1, temp2, temp.txt. > But after that, when I type '?' key, ? is not inserted in the buffer > because C-h c ? tells that it runs completion-help-at-point. This is > very annoying. What I want to do is to delete only temp1 and temp2 by > typing "rm temp?". It's not a bug it's a feature. You can use `C-q ?' of course. Stefan