From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9754: Issue with Emacs 23.4 Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4FAC34DA.7040606@cs.ucla.edu> <4FB2A9C7.3070604@cornell.edu> <4FB2CFF9.70309@cs.ucla.edu> <4FB2D8AB.7030401@cornell.edu> <878vgsrpoh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <4FB4DB2D.7040100@cornell.edu> <4FB4F27B.40508@cornell.edu> <4FB542E2.7020304@cornell.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337364169 29766 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2012 18:02:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9754@debbugs.gnu.org, Achim Gratz , Paul Eggert To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 18 20:02:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVn-0008L9-2z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 20:02:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44682 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVm-0002Sl-JV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVj-0002SV-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVh-00009Y-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:42 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVh-00009U-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRW2-00083F-DI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9754 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 9754-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9754.133736416930926 (code B ref 9754); Fri, 18 May 2012 18:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9754) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2012 18:02:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33083 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVo-00082l-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:13909) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVRVn-00082Z-5E for 9754@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAOMAh09FpZld/2dsb2JhbAA3DqM0gQiBdQEBBAFWIwULCw4mEhQYDSSIE6IRi3Y0OgkBAgECgz4Dg3AEo2OEBVM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="181020518" Original-Received: from 69-165-153-93.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.153.93]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 18 May 2012 14:02:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5669E59577; Fri, 18 May 2012 14:02:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB542E2.7020304@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown's message of "Thu, 17 May 2012 14:26:42 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60191 Archived-At: > I understand, and I'm no longer proposing the patch for the emacs-24 branch. > My question is about what should be done in the trunk. It seems to me that > it would be better to use x_in_use, and I'm wondering if knowledgeable > people agree. I do think it's better, yes. Stefan