From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16818: Acknowledgement (Undo in region after markers in undo history relocated) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:43:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393364725 11510 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2014 21:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16818@debbugs.gnu.org To: Barry OReilly Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 25 22:45:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPog-0007nq-Ni for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:45:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPog-0007uM-Dt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:45:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPoQ-0007mZ-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:45:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPoH-00036E-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:45:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPoH-000360-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPoH-0001a1-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:45:05 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:45:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16818.13933646515970 (code B ref 16818); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:45:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2014 21:44:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPnP-0001YD-30 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:56652) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIPnJ-0001Xz-LX for 16818@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F8D84DE2; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:44:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B89B1E5B74; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:43:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 09E0CB4128; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:43:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Barry OReilly's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:46:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86224 Archived-At: > What makes more sense to me is that the old value of mark-marker is > pushed onto the rings, then a new marker object is created to become > the value of mark-marker. Then the marker adjustment records would > reference the right markers. Effectively this means the mark would > follow the advice of the Elisp manual excerpt above. That sounds right. I don't have time to really understand the ins and outs, but if you can write an ERT test case for it, we could install the change. Stefan