From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22066: 24.5; documentation for "values" is not accurate Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:29:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zhksiyyl.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87blcvm3m4.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1alemu.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6sdlmiy.fsf@gnus.org> <875z31lllw.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh0di7p2.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24093"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Shiyao Ma , 22066@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 19:39:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Xv6-00068T-52 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:39:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58842 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Xuv-0007No-60 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:39:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Xlz-0006Vt-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Xly-0008NT-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Xly-0007ua-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 22066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22066.161289535430337 (code B ref 22066); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 18:29:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9XlC-0007tE-0D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:51452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Xl9-0007t3-TE for 22066@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F469440BDC; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:29:06 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 01376440B4E; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:29:05 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1612895345; bh=F+Bx4wArBlfta1U0rx9aQHbwSaELy6t+BxiiSiU2i2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=E+1FUuQTcWeDZUMi/AHye7ODAfI7IqE7+bJJh99Gy3zeuZMDye0vWyUGqGLBhlMnK x/HORi2rOaweMi/OkTKCHivojGBbnTiThoF1KCdpzIFEdNwZeL2p1S8HLEnJUobRvs 0IRHOBgJGtt7yB3AzEUzGleodvCF5UtEfFa4imp4RoOKmdof9Y264Y/vNLsCG1q0on sYueuVglY7QeCXVGFrlyhed8VpgH5v2bfFioQE+INBisjl8lXtB4h04NCb7HTx9bYY BdUKTLUCEpRmLcIDjw3BVsqPX6rkvuPhriYCi9S29X/EYN/u/K1q3WrlttsH45zK5/ uhdX92/VoAtOw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C72A2120218; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:29:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87zh0di7p2.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:26:01 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199712 Archived-At: >> So we'd issue a warning for >> >> ... values ... >> >> but not for >> >> (let ((values ...)) ... values ...) >> >> ? > > Yes, that would be good. Actually, I see this is the case now. So maybe we can actually declare them as `make-obsolete-variable` now. Stefan