From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10117: duplicate evaluation of after-change-functions hooks in revert-buffer Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:42:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4ECCD677.1090900@inria.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322059428 14507 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2011 14:43:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tiphaine Turpin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 15:43:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE32-00054R-E3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:43:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE31-0001Ri-UC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE2z-0001Rb-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE2y-0006tS-Jp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:43:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE2y-0006rO-Gl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE4L-00064Y-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10117.132205944223261 (code B ref 10117); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2011 14:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE3M-00062h-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTE3K-00062a-KU for 10117@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:43:59 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAO8FzU5FxIbt/2dsb2JhbABEqmqBBoFyAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBi0QYpiBIggmgKETg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,559,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="149155053" Original-Received: from 69-196-134-237.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.134.237]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Nov 2011 09:42:31 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7059658E47; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:42:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4ECCD677.1090900@inria.fr> (Tiphaine Turpin's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:18:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:45:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54217 Archived-At: > Am I wrong when I assume that the sequence of modifications passed to the > after-change-functions is an exact trace of the buffer contents evolution ? Well, it should be, yes. > What could possibly cause such a duplicate event ? A bug in revert-buffer? revert-buffer modifies the buffer on its own rather than via calls to delete and insert, so it runs those change-functions "by hand". Do you have a small test case reproducing the problem? Stefan