From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12823: Invalid font name Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:51:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pq2rlceb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354557107 18482 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2012 17:51:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12823@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 03 18:51:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaBR-0001h7-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:51:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38131 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaBF-0002X4-Q5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaBA-0002Ws-IC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:51:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaB9-0003EU-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaB9-0003EM-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaDS-00057q-9v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12823 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12823-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12823.135455723119685 (code B ref 12823); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2012 17:53:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaDE-00057Q-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:42674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TfaDA-00057G-VL for 12823@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:53:46 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qB3HpKrV015619; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:51:20 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E1F32B415D; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:51:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87pq2rlceb.fsf@gnu.org> (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:21:00 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4421=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4421> : streams <870503> : uri <1284298> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67853 Archived-At: >> > If we don't have that name first in the list, we must have another >> > index specifying which name is a valid face attribute value, or must >> > have another tables that map numeric values of font spec to face >> > attribute values. >> My understanding is that this issue is only related to whether or not >> `semi-condensed' is in the list, but is unrelated to whether it comes >> before or after `semicondensed' in the list. > And, what is your opinion on "whether or not > `semi-condensed' is in the list"? IIUC you said that `semi-condensed' should be in the list, and that's fine by me. The remaining question is whether it should come first. Stefan