From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19513: shift-select-mode fails to be fully buffer-local Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:06:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420578473 14813 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2015 21:07:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 21:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19513@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 22:07:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bLM-0005ua-4V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 22:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38236 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bLL-0006Qz-EE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bLH-0006Qt-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:07:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bLC-00023W-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bLC-00023O-Rs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bLC-0001dX-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19513 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19513-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19513.14205783686233 (code B ref 19513); Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19513) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2015 21:06:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38979 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bKJ-0001cS-SK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:41777) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8bKG-0001cI-O4 for 19513@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t06L62b1015807; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7D296EF8; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:06:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kelly Dean's message of "Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:20:11 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5178=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5178> : inlines <1723> : streams <1369172> : uri <1841487> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98071 Archived-At: > I'm the only user of vimizer. I haven't sent it to a package repository yet, > because I only recently had time to disentangle it from the rest of my > custom code and make a standalone package, and I need to dogfood it > for a while to make sure I didn't introduce any new bugs. When I do send it, > other people won't want to have to globally disable shift-select. It definitely shouldn't globally disable shift-select-mode. But the behavior you seem not to like doesn't look like a bug to me (the bug#19513 is indeed a bug, OTOH), and I don't see any obvious reason why it should look like a bug to other users. >> If not, maybe the right answer is to tell them they should disable >> shift-select-mode. > Right now, line-select does say it's incompatible with shift-select, and > refuses to turn on unless shift-select is disabled. But > that's a poor workaround. I don't think it's incompatible. Maybe you don't like the interaction, but I think it's just because you don't like shift-select-mode's current behavior. Stefan