From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20284: 25.0.50; sexp parser breaks when 'vectors' are in docstring Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:27:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428604100 21761 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2015 18:28:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20284@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tim Visher Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 09 20:28:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHBT-0007Q1-Vw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:28:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHBT-0008Bx-9p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHBP-0008Bq-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHBK-0001RT-U4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHBK-0001RL-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHBK-0005mh-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20284 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 20284-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20284.142860406622212 (code B ref 20284); Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2015 18:27:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHB3-0005mA-Vo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:59037) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgHB1-0005m1-Cu for 20284@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t39IRfbM008356; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3AC192D4A; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:27:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Tim Visher's message of "Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:06:48 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5271=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5271> : inlines <2672> : streams <1419709> : uri <1902712> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101344 Archived-At: > But shouldn't parens inside a string have nothing at all do with the > sexp parsing? In an ideal world, yes. Stefan