From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11339: 24.1.50; read-{buffer,file-name}-completion-ignore-case fails on non-ascii Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:24:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ehrbyg8t.fsf@escher.home> <87lfszxtcl.fsf@marxist.se> <83bltvl55x.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8xvz0hp.fsf@gmx.net> <83tv7mkb0l.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0ea9uxg.fsf@gmx.net> <83eeyphr5q.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfsvyd4i.fsf@gmx.net> <87h83jy5kp.fsf@gmx.net> <83v9rzh8gs.fsf@gnu.org> <875zjzy0yg.fsf@gmx.net> <831rulgcw3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wocb21so.fsf@gmx.net> <83tv7fekkf.fsf@gnu.org> <83h83feesw.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeyh9zjn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="157311"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 11339@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, stefan@marxist.se To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 19:25:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVQ7-000emI-PS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:25:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVQ5-0006Ye-DY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVPy-0006YW-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVPy-0004Ec-0W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVPx-0004EC-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:25:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVPx-00024l-Ja for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11339 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 11339-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11339.15733238597916 (code B ref 11339); Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11339) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2019 18:24:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVPG-00023c-N4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTVPE-00023O-9q for 11339@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 13:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB8F7449A5E; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:24:10 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 83EF544715F; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:24:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1573323849; bh=lF4/64aBxPTvsTrS+GoTOvgZKyUve80dUYeENfK19SI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DFgj6o/KtY0Q7rZSsbx3cS2sM7vGpiPJ1vNYFPJxXvL43n+7Pk82xjijniza4IORB GCtJkT+vxlT3xWhzn1rUaeT2f6/1VSjhODx9J2wFCzXbbsyggYIUj09ZnHgMiOCt3Y t0Lk2IB/nzWqrJdwloiVU7p9jZtm5w1bom0s+QSyfCK9k9swirIyHs0bbc25rONq4+ y4bYwDJJ4iy4+o8hq0TGRNxldi3uMpDLYONYaziJanRCzbO2/xKPKnTmDd9zOYrV61 sODp1dC4rame2vT1QMBFLedblfq6C4vWRuyewDMNwWQGEOllwJJ+xkcNuTVWWgXkjs A6axRMRSidX8Q== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.47.134]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8A0812096D; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:24:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83eeyh9zjn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:20:12 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171344 Archived-At: > What about the below? It passes all the tests, and also fixes the > original use case. Sounds good. I have the impression that I was the original author of that "early exit" optimization (or at least some of it), but my brain must be decaying because I have a hard time understanding the code. I also wonder if it's really worth the effort (of the optimization, I mean). Stefan