From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6204: vc-dir always splits the frame Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4jwrv35d7a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878w7fa7cr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BF504B4.50408@gmx.at> <4BF5736B.1030605@gmx.at> <4BF79ABA.7080006@gmx.at> <87ljbbv4u4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y6fbqtq2.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BF91C54.4070608@gmx.at> <4BF97C5B.409@gmx.at> <4BFBEE76.7000003@gmx.at> <4BFC099E.2000404@gmx.at> <4BFCDC3A.3000300@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274882254 12824 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2010 13:57:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 13:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6204@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 15:57:31 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHH6x-0007Zr-0i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 15:57:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHH6w-0006kr-1E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53262 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHH6o-0006kg-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHH6n-0001tW-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHH6n-0001tS-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHH6U-0007ah-GI; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6204.127488221629168 (code B ref 6204); Wed, 26 May 2010 13:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2010 13:56:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHH6M-0007aP-Mv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHH6L-0007aK-JD for 6204@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:53 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABPF/EtLd+tS/2dsb2JhbACeH3LBJoUTBIxC X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,304,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="65445495" Original-Received: from 75-119-235-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.235.82]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 26 May 2010 09:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7067C80E5; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFCDC3A.3000300@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 26 May 2010 10:30:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:57:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37290 Archived-At: >> Yes, I'm picturing the special arg as (conceptually) two alists, and >> that we'd combine with the user's own setting via something like >> (append override-params >> (lookup special-display-regexps) >> default-params) > Good. Now how do `pop-up-windows', `pop-up-frames', and > `display-buffer-reuse-frames' fit into this? I'd force display-buffer-reuse-frames to t and forget about it ;-) > I suppose these are the values for all buffers not mentioned by > `special-display-regexps'. Pretty much, yes. > What if `pop-up-windows' is nil and "default-params" indicates that > the application wants to pop up a window (but does not insist). > Probably `pop-up-windows' should prevail in this case. No, the application's choice should prevail because it's more specific. Stefan