From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10726: 24.0.93; `find-file-noselect': why should it interrogate the user? Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <012A5E800AD44CC090696172BAD6F5A3@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328537486 3241 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 14:11:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10726@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 15:11:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPHw-0007jc-HO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:11:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPHv-000385-Sv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPHo-00037f-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPHj-0007E5-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPHj-0007Dv-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPIX-0003ae-Hw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10726 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10726-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10726.132853751813786 (code B ref 10726); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10726) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2012 14:11:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPIU-0003aH-A9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:58 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:62446) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPIS-0003a1-U9; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:57 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAMfeL09MCqD0/2dsb2JhbABDrRCCKIEGgXIBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSID7krjA4SAgIDBgIEAgEEAgIMBgoBAgGEHQEEBBgCCgSDLwSIRJsDhFo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,370,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="161431009" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-244.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.244]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Feb 2012 09:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DA7ED58BE3; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:11:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <012A5E800AD44CC090696172BAD6F5A3@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:25:15 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56560 Archived-At: severity 10726 wishlist thanks > I do see that `find-file-noselect' has been posing questions to the user > since Day One. But I do not see why that is appropriate. I would think FWIW, I largely agree on the principle. But I think that requires non-trivial changes, including maybe adding a new "really non-interactive" version of find-file-noselect. Stefan