From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25280: 25.1; define-inline doesn't support &rest Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:25:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482853829 18654 195.159.176.226 (27 Dec 2016 15:50:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:50:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25280@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 27 16:50:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLu0z-0002ai-FA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:50:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54651 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLu12-0008R4-86 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLtdd-0005Y2-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:26:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLtda-0002aa-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLtda-0002aU-H1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLtda-0002bD-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25280.14828523309954 (code B ref 25280); Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2016 15:25:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLtd4-0002aT-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLtd2-0002aL-6C for 25280@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:25:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id uBRFPPms023145; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:25:26 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 91333AE10D; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:25:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Tue, 27 Dec 2016 12:25:03 +0800") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV5901=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5901> : inlines <5609> : streams <1726484> : uri <2347960> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127500 Archived-At: > (let ((x 1) (y 2)) (princ (rest x y))) ; B > So A prints [1 2] and B [x y] i.e. x y is not eval'd. thoughts? Hmm... indeed... and it breaks down even with (rest (+ x 1) y). Stefan