From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:09:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274812052 16064 80.91.229.12 (25 May 2010 18:27:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 20:27:30 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyqf-00046r-P7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:27:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGyqf-00085B-4s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50575 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGyqW-00084v-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyqV-0001wK-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:27:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyqV-0001wE-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyZm-0006TF-RQ; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6241.127481099624858 (code B ref 6241); Tue, 25 May 2010 18:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2010 18:09:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyZf-0006Ss-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:09:55 -0400 Original-Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyZd-0006Sk-Qq; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:09:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([96.21.101.38]) by VL-MH-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L2Z002CYMGCALO0@VL-MH-MR003.ip.videotron.ca>; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:09:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CBBC4660D3; Tue, 25 May 2010 14:09:47 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:10:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37271 Archived-At: reopen 6241 thanks >> AFAIK it's been buffer-local for a while now. >> Maybe you haven't updated your checkout in the last 19 years? > Lennart didn't write "buffer-local", but *permanent* local, i.e., > (put 'buffer-offer-save 'permanent-local t) Oh, I see, sorry for being too trigger-happy. Hmm... I'm not sure whether it would be good or not, and more importantly, I'm not sure how it'd affect existing code. Could someone investigate how safe would be such a change, and could someone argue for (and/or against) it? Stefan