From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7747: Please put current file name in the prompt for rename-file Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:53:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <18DA5640211F43C3B3DE7C161ED13DE2@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293938636 10081 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2011 03:23:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 03:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7747@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 02 04:23:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZEXq-0007pG-KL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 04:23:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZEXp-00026q-J6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:23:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56933 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZEXk-00025Q-AZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZEXj-0002Zq-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:23:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZEXj-0002Zm-7i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZDyH-0005Ph-Or; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 02:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7747 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7747-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7747.129393639520771 (code B ref 7747); Sun, 02 Jan 2011 02:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2011 02:46:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZDxq-0005Ox-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:46:34 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZDxo-0005OS-Be; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:46:32 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAKF3H01Ld/TY/2dsb2JhbACkR3S7NoVKBIRljhs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,261,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="86887396" Original-Received: from 75-119-244-216.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.244.216]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Jan 2011 21:53:33 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A30E658DFC; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:53:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 2 Jan 2011 03:28:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:47:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42995 Archived-At: retitle 7747 Allow choice of "default in M-n" vs "default in `initial'" severity 7747 wishlist thanks > I think this is a much better UI than the current implementation to > handle default values. Clearly, that's the one you're used to from the rest of your w32 world. Whether it's better or not also depends on whether you use and like delete-selection-mode. In any case, I don't think the default will change any time soon in this respect, but I do hope that we will change the code so that end users can choose between the two behaviors. Stefan