From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7840: 23.2.91; default-terminal-coding-system not inherited by created terminals Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:33:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295047480 18818 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2011 23:24:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7840@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 15 00:24:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdt0U-0002Mi-Cm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:24:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pdt0T-0000JA-Ov for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:24:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57468 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pdt0L-0000H6-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:24:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdt0J-0004Xs-8X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:24:25 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdt0J-0004Xo-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdsoL-00070s-OP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7840 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7840-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7840.129504670926936 (code B ref 7840); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7840) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2011 23:11:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdso8-00070P-Sx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:11:49 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdso7-00070D-1u for 7840@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:11:47 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMHADVpME1FxIbi/2dsb2JhbAAzpCd0ux+FTwSEa44u X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,325,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="88130307" Original-Received: from 69-196-134-226.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.134.226]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 Jan 2011 18:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4BBAF66164; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:33:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:45:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:12:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43373 Archived-At: > Any reason not to honor default-terminal-coding-system and > default-keyboard-coding-system when we create a new terminal? Probably a simple oversight. Stefan