From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8711: 24.0.50; binding _ to unused values with lexical-binding Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:00:34 -0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307025221 15900 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2011 14:33:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8711@debbugs.gnu.org, Helmut Eller To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 02 16:33:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8xr-00052h-9e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:33:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8xp-0004AY-MM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:33:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8SP-0004MJ-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8SN-0006x8-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8SN-0006wl-Hm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8SM-0006Vv-9i; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8711 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8711-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8711.130702324625015 (code B ref 8711); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8711) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2011 14:00:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8S5-0006VP-R4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:00:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8S3-0006VC-Tp for 8711@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:00:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:18854 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8Ry-0000Ve-0i; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2D05D660DD; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:00:34 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:41:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46892 Archived-At: > Meanwhile, will you complain if I change that particular case (in > doc-view.el) to be like > (let (...) > (dolist (var list) > ...) > result) > to avoid the warning? I don't know which particular case you're referring to, but I've already installed such changes under the banner "silence compiler warnings". So yes, by all means, Stefan