From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69056: 30.0.50; history-add-new-input and recursive minibuffers Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86zfw1v7wu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9993"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69056@debbugs.gnu.org, me@eshelyaron.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 15 20:55:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rahpB-0002M5-GF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:55:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rahol-0007QF-1g; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rahoi-0007Oh-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:44 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rahoh-0001OD-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rahoz-00063m-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69056-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69056.170802687523259 (code B ref 69056); Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2024 19:54:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rahoZ-000635-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:47615) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rahoX-00062r-LD for 69056@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33F421000C3; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1708026848; bh=j6hGusEZ11e6yivysAkXD/oW5VlmoyHAVgHGOKBAlZY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=jOOsxVs9T56RM/8UX05uu3iVg9FnTkQaQYqnXyr1+l+soUP5GI76hdoJDdK4W8Yqe WDds4XiSg0Ov4mM6K+F7jjeZVkFbRkHRvYteJgQ4La42ZowPiX5iSzuH/cKD6ebsbS VtfUEb9vHHm8j/G1hBahYVr32dR39RZNUOGfPsDlPVmPMGrBX+qQSYc+rosLiDxTJZ AZ9v3ic5ZMLPl26KVigOtlUae2uuxEloe4DiGicf0Fdmjzfy0QhXFvEPIap4eQQxHR +T4HbyUF3kAwKh+WL7DfJ23zPF4LgiZQj8Pe5mMu7Ch0jsYpQD8zP1ayYWe13lMWbw xwZgJerUzB6Hw== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 25DDC10004B; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:08 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [23.233.149.155]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 033C4120131; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86zfw1v7wu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:34:09 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280079 Archived-At: > for very little gain. The more general issue with let-binding > variables around APIs that enter the minibuffer stays, so I see little I agree that it would be good to tackle this more general problem. Basically, should we treat recursive-edits as if they were run in a sort of separate thread (with the original thread blocked until the new thread exits)? I think we can't do that in general, since I think we sometimes do want let-bindings performed around `read-from-minibuffer` to affect the command executed inside the minibuffer. But we should maybe experiment with it to get a clearer idea of where we do want/need it and where we don't. Stefan