From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later` Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:44:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87v84vedqt.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7211"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 70221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Felician Nemeth Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 00:47:20 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rssLA-0001gS-Ev for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 00:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rssKp-000864-RE; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:46:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rssKm-00085n-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rssKm-0003sK-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rssKs-0006ug-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 70221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70221.171235721626551 (code B ref 70221); Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2024 22:46:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rssKk-0006ty-Je for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41773) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rssKh-0006tE-FC for 70221@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 36C91441474; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:46:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1712357198; bh=hSHgTy54NlhH/VvcmHSeXWEPLb2ubkVoIYo8Hd3UpKM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KbDHNNqNY6kAwu3jOy5oEzEqgAyMfsUcTtF/HiWVGwXzdNFnuYITIGF1AZVOOinRP l+l1bmRiVaEpyM/VK45Ofri11rgvJFxQXOLenbNMSjM9P1HgDkjpo5FWv172ywJWK/ 3EmotrpyPRXvFDePbn90D3eLuB59RZPNad1cAXoUNssdYGeKO7UTN79rASMvfu/PfU CDO8volHIy9oqRFcNxRkBl92l6z5iuLxlQRDYxBkX+1qQ9GvzKsGJt1nRXuBuJCX+U UXdQO0F/Yq09rvHVFarzUJKxKxK/srkTEGfNF0ewmc6EiIWlShxh7ml6HSUe2BWTg/ 5toQdBE1ADOWw== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0FB444413B4; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:46:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F173512032D; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:46:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87v84vedqt.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu> (Felician Nemeth's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:49:46 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:282732 Archived-At: > Do this mean (run-with-timer 0 nil ...) can always be replaced with a > more efficient (funcall-later ...)? If so, would it make sense to > modify run-with-time as well to call funcall-later when if its first two > argument is (0 nil)? No: beside the fact that they are run at slightly different times (which might be OK), `funcall-later` doesn't return a handle you can then use to cancel the call. Stefan