From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12456: 24.2.50; Completion in `Info-goto-node' (cross-manual jump) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sjaf26jt.fsf@gnu.org> <83boh31lrj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347987471 9012 80.91.229.3 (18 Sep 2012 16:57:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12456@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 18:57:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE17P-0000Qr-Ip for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:57:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33873 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE17L-00035i-5T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE17J-00035U-7t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE17G-0002Kn-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:45 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE17G-0002Kd-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TE18Y-0007Yw-Ev for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12456 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12456-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12456.134798753029024 (code B ref 12456); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12456) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2012 16:58:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TE18L-0007Y2-JH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:58:50 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:36500) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TE18H-0007Xi-Hf for 12456@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:58:48 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8IGvMtl026595; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id ACCD8B4071; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:57:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:26:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64562 Archived-At: > I think that a reasonable behavior would be: > * "(eli" completes just to "(elisp)" (or all manuals which begin > with "eli"). Yes, that already works. > * "(elisp)" completes to all nodes in the elisp manual. Yes, that's the part that's not yet implemented. Patch welcome, Stefan