From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17446: 24.4.50; What is the situation around `called-interactively-p'? Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 10:50:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tx8z6sp2.fsf@gmail.com> <819a6ab8-db8e-4176-a778-02218f08e7af@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399647096 30117 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2014 14:51:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17446@debbugs.gnu.org, Thierry Volpiatto To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 09 16:51:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8v-0002xk-Ee for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 16:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8u-0005AS-V9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8k-00059w-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8c-0007uu-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8c-0007up-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8c-0001fU-HM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17446 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17446-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17446.13996470586400 (code B ref 17446); Fri, 09 May 2014 14:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17446) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2014 14:50:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8Y-0001fA-0J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:29379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wim8W-0001es-2j for 17446@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 10:50:56 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYGAIDvNVNMCqwB/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSr0vgw6BFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArYGAIDvNVNMCqwB/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSr0vgw6BFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="62068264" Original-Received: from 76-10-172-1.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.172.1]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 May 2014 10:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EEE9D60203; Fri, 9 May 2014 10:50:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <819a6ab8-db8e-4176-a778-02218f08e7af@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 9 May 2014 07:28:13 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88824 Archived-At: > You end up doing for your new command something like what Emacs > does for `repeat-complex-command'. Yes. > And AFAICT, that works only > when the helper function (similar to vanilla Emacs function > `repeat-complex-command--called-interactively-skip') is > byte-compiled. Ah, now I understand the "byte-compiled" part (I kept thinking it was about whether the command (i.e. callee) is byte-compiled). > Useful for packages like Icicles and Helm would be a build in > (defun fake-interactive-call (command &rest args) ...) > factored out of what is now hidden inside `repeat-complex-command'. Yes, that makes a lot of sense now. Before we go about doing that, I'd want to know one more thing: how did icicles and helm does with it, in previous versions of Emacs? Stefan