From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16567: 24.3.50; pcase should signal an error if no case matches Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:54:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410371730 13073 80.91.229.3 (10 Sep 2014 17:55:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16567@debbugs.gnu.org, Helmut Eller , Leo Liu To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 10 19:55:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm6z-0000dE-SA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:55:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57926 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm6z-0007Qp-Ig for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm6p-0007Pr-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm6h-0002yY-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm6h-0002wu-3O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm6g-0003dR-8i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16567 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16567.141037166313915 (code B ref 16567); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2014 17:54:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36985 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm62-0003cK-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:58570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRm60-0003cA-0I for 16567@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s8AHsIx7002639; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:54:18 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6E93C63DE7; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:54:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:54:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5060=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5060> : inlines <1276> : streams <1286524> : uri <1812426> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93247 Archived-At: >> I'm open to other suggestions, and `pcasex' is not unacceptable, so >> I think we're closing in. > And would you be prepared to add the > entirely-equivalent-but-somehow-we-managed-fine-without-them-all-this-time > condx and cl-casex? We already have `cl-ecase'. As for `condx', no I'd rather not ;-) Stefan