From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1298: allow 'emacsclient -a "emacs --daemon && emacsclient -c"' Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:37:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200811021818.mA2IIFMq028772@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812080754.mB87sXSV016391@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812081709.mB8H9T2m017554@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812082020.mB8KKnf2018098@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812091858.mB9IwW8K022220@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812100758.mBA7wlR5024667@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812101503.mBAF3d2p025533@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229015374 9231 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2008 17:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Juanma Barranquero To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 18:10:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LAp2i-0004S5-Np for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:09:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39451 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAp1X-0007W5-DN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:08:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAoxb-0004OS-CW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAoxZ-0004MN-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48079 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAoxY-0004M7-Uv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:36972) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAoxY-00080B-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBBH4Ivw031482; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:04:18 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBBGj3n1024848; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:45:03 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1298 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1298-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1298.122901344122841 (code B ref 1298); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:45:02 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 119; neutral, 49; spammy, 7. spammytokens:0.999-2--calm, 0.997-1--elses, 0.997-1--else's, 0.993-1--controversial, 0.963-+--concluded hammytokens:0.000-+--emacs, 0.000-+--H*M:fsf, 0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus Original-Received: (at 1298) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Dec 2008 16:37:21 +0000 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.pppoe.ca [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBBGbIZU022824 for <1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:37:20 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcFAAPQQElFxIVh/2dsb2JhbACBbMwEgnmBLIJH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,753,1220241600"; d="scan'208";a="30926919" Original-Received: from 69-196-133-97.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.133.97]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2008 11:37:13 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 52E0586F6; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:37:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200812101503.mBAF3d2p025533@mothra.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:03:39 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:04:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23186 Archived-At: > As you well know my taste is exactly not to add such #defines. There's > not such #define in the daemon implementation in src, the new macro in > undocumented, and your move was just designed as a provocation. Please, let's calm down. I generally agree that it's better to use "#ifdef " than "#ifdef " (tho it always depends on the specifics), so to a large extent I prefer Juanma's code in this case. But in any case, when it's a question of taste, the one who wrote the code (Juanma in this case, even if it touched the code you wrote) gets to choose. Only ever change someone else's code when it's uncontroversial, or only after a discussion here concluded it's better to change it. In this case, it's clearly controversial. Stefan