From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5235: 23.1; Unibyte keyboard input problem Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:40:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200912162217.14991.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> <4B2A60A1.2050804@gnu.org> <200912172025.58502.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261627651 5465 80.91.229.12 (24 Dec 2009 04:07:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5235@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 24 05:07:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NNeyv-00076B-Tj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:07:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36223 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NNeyw-0003Q8-19 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:07:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NNeyq-0003PY-Td for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NNeym-0003Os-Tz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60977 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NNeym-0003Op-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53233) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NNeym-0003ur-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NNepv-0005NB-1T; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:58:03 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5235 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5235-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5235.126162707920634 (code B ref 5235); Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2009 03:57:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NNepq-0005Mi-MZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:57:58 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NNecC-0005GN-PP for 5235@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBO3hheY029591; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:43:45 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 05E3D6435B; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:40:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200912172025.58502.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> ("Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek"'s?= message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:25:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3434=0 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:57:57 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:58:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33736 Archived-At: > In multibyte mode (I mean no --unibyte) Emacs 23.1 works great for me :) --unibyte is deprecated, so rather than try and "fix" it, we want to fix the problem that caused you to use --unibyte. > I'll try to explain why I need unibyte mode. I'm maintener of a C/C++ > source code which has comments coded in cp1250 (polish language) but > strings in code are coded in cp852. So I have two different code > pages in source code file. This is old source code and it was > developed in Windows (that's why comments are in cp1250) but is > compiled to work on MS-DOS (that's why strings are coded in cp852). So what happens if you read those files as binary (i.e. C-x RET r binary RET)? Stefan