From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12583: latest org-mode changes exposes bug in `comment-forward'in newcomment.el Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <91FE7CF1DA974412A922D439CF16A994@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349543269 881 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2012 17:07:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12583@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Le Wang' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 06 19:07:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXr0-0008Cr-LO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:07:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53631 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXqu-0003k5-OH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXqs-0003jp-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXqq-0008Fr-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXqq-0008Fn-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXr7-0001AW-MK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12583.13495432734477 (code B ref 12583); Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2012 17:07:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58429 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXqz-0001AA-04 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:34605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXqx-0001A3-GH for 12583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q96H7XGv029996; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AAEC8B40A1; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:07:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <91FE7CF1DA974412A922D439CF16A994@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 6 Oct 2012 08:53:42 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65280 Archived-At: > The doc string of `comment-normalize-vars' says, BTW, that it is the > functions that are autoloaded from newcomment.el that should call > `c-n-v'. That's actually a good guideline, yes. > But you seem to be saying that those are not the only ones. No. AFAICT it's basically the same since all the autoloaded functions of newcomment.el are commands. > It is also the case that not all functions that are autoloaded from > newcomment.el call `c-n-v'. That would be a bug, I think. Stefan