From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16411: undo-only bugs Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:52:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389664396 3760 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2014 01:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16411@debbugs.gnu.org To: Barry OReilly Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 14 02:53:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tBw-0006nW-QZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:53:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46002 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tBw-0006Qr-DV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:53:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tBm-0006Pi-3A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:53:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tBe-0007So-QN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tBe-0007Sk-Mj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tBe-0001SU-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16411 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16411-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16411.13896643275467 (code B ref 16411); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16411) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2014 01:52:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tAl-0001Q6-9y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:58710) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2tAj-0001Pw-UO for 16411@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:52:06 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFMCoyj/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSQuh3AGwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFMCoyj/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSQuh3AGwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="44871627" Original-Received: from 76-10-140-163.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.140.163]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 13 Jan 2014 20:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A6350612B0; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:52:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:49:39 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83435 Archived-At: >> Actually, this makes me realize the solution to bug 1 is inadequate. >> Calling (undo-primitive 1) N times creates N redo records whereas >> (undo-primitive N) creates one. > No, primitive-undo does not add any undo boundary. Actually, now I'm not sure what you meant by "redo records". (primitive-undo N) will undo all the M "records" that appear before the next Nth undo boundary, and will correspondingly add M redo "records", but no boundary. Stefan