From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19511: 25.0.50; Failed assertions in redisplay() code. (dispnew.c:1405; xdisp.c:17524) Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:53:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878uhiji5m.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <83tx058bjm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4phupt5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420480518 26718 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2015 17:55:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Matthias , 19511-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Vitalie Spinu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 18:55:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Bry-0007t9-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:55:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Bry-0002JQ-8k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Brv-0002IN-Jr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Brr-0008BF-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:55:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Brr-0008Ax-Fm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Brr-00038Q-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:55:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:55:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19511-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D19511.142048046311965 (code D ref 19511); Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:55:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19511-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2015 17:54:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8BrD-00036u-FH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:56375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8BrB-00036m-1V for 19511-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:54:21 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD808514A; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:54:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F761E5B8D; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:53:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 20BD3B4057; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:53:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87y4phupt5.fsf@gmail.com> (Vitalie Spinu's message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2015 08:59:02 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98041 Archived-At: > Removing it doesn't change the fact that buffers are switched > (with-current-buffer ...) inside font-lock-fontify-region-function. with-current-buffer is basically equivalent to something like (let ((current-buffer ..)) ...) [ tho implemented differently for technical reasons. ] So it doesn't have any undesirable interactions with the redisplay code. > Would it be enough to remove `bury-buffer` call to get back the > optimization? What are other elisp functions that can potentially > invalidate window_end? Any function which changes which buffer is being displayed in a particular window. Stefan