From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19988: 25.0.50; Drag events ending in different frame Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:49:22 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k2yycfwh.fsf@gnu.org> <54F72082.8080709@gmx.at> <87a8zs4g9c.fsf@gnu.org> <54F80E72.3040609@gmx.at> <54F9F836.7010103@gmx.at> <54FA1C9E.9040806@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425689420 23141 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2015 00:50:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 00:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19988@debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 07 01:50:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wT-0005Je-El for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 01:50:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wS-0007ZB-PV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wO-0007XT-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:50:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wN-0008Vs-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wN-0008VO-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wM-0000St-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:50:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19988 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19988-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19988.14256893951770 (code B ref 19988); Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19988) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2015 00:49:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wF-0000SP-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:49:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:33310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YU2wC-0000SB-1s; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:49:53 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t270nYNP020890; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:49:35 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1B7A064188; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:49:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <54FA1C9E.9040806@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:31:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5237=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5237> : inlines <2381> : streams <1401171> : uri <1873243> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100208 Archived-At: > We'd still have to resolve the case where one Emacs frame obscures > another. If one of the two is the top window (i.e. the one that's actually visible), then we should use that one, and we should be able to figure it out at the C level (i.e. it should be the one that is in the event structure). If not, then it doesn't really matter if we "get it right" or not. Stefan