From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43572: Feature request: make it possible to choose whether the first lines of the minibuffer should be displayed instead of the last ones Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:26:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22497"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 43572@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 24 18:29:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU7I-0005ii-1j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:29:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU7H-0006rc-0L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU5G-00059P-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU5G-0007Ev-47 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU5F-0000yS-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43572 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43572-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43572.16009648123729 (code B ref 43572); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43572) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2020 16:26:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU55-0000y4-S4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:26:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:51750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kLU52-0000xo-Oz for 43572@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16E47100251; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:26:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 92CA5100096; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:26:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1600964801; bh=eBkwlYjPrzhipOZ3hsT/C5x4VbVMEeZbZXgvV/TRD1Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Rjp8eFXosuF49sMpnDItHihV1akaCQzz4OjeNjbhJpMO26Rgs1eDrbojvtLew2JUU 2M03z676GQ3LmeAVSZoEgFJw3jHZDGmSsmnS9E04NYEyeaeDRmq+SbgoSXH34W/lnh ZWkO7o6kd+YRO5Cj9cSOR/WapU39lJx5HeCQqmY3YHJXvc7omSKO1joxttOBy1LW7E idDh5Jy5trF3GSv62cDgCwBfzdHH4ZdPYXY7xoTXf1l8pJzEa0g5Hrn+gi+RpxNZkF BfyBO5m6/FzHhrdcb1ZhmJWsexgwK8yth3xfHF5u9KCsylJ1pH3VxIgJyDw2ZDM/B5 q/XEv3JShlyhA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E274120746; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:26:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:45:29 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188876 Archived-At: >>> Simply because I asked my window manager to always maximize Emacs frames. >> Aha! >> Yet another loophole! > Hmm... Given the popularity (among a certain kind of users) of tiling > window managers and the popularity (among a much larger kind of users) of > using fullscreen apps, I don't think Emacs can expect to fully control the > size of its frame. But indeed I see what you mean, ideally emacs -Q should > give a frame of the same size everywhere. So it could perhaps make sense to > try to do something like: > > (set-frame-width nil 80) > (set-frame-height nil 40) > > (which works for me) at the end of the initialization process with "-q" or > "-Q". I definitely wouldn't want that for `-q`. It might make sense in this case for `-Q`, but I'm not sure it's a good tradeoff since we also want `emacs -Q` to mean something like "run with no special configuration". So maybe a better option is for the recipe to specify the frame's width. Stefan