From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2137: 23.0.60; Saving Rmail buffer does not show the "Saving file ..." message Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:21:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233791515 13385 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2009 23:51:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 00:53:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUrYF-0006m0-DM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:53:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53171 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUrWw-0007Tj-D8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:51:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUrP9-0003x3-Q3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUrP5-0003tt-8n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35646 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUrP5-0003tj-59 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:37791) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUrP4-0005vL-J1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n14NhVEi015950; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:43:32 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n14NU2Ya012375; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:30:02 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2137 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2137-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2137.123378971411102 (code B ref 2137); Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2137) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Feb 2009 23:21:54 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n14NLop6011096 for <2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:21:52 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsIEACOyiUlFxIvi/2dsb2JhbACBbs8KhBYGgwI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,381,1231131600"; d="scan'208";a="33341387" Original-Received: from 69-196-139-226.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.139.226]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2009 18:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 17E0C83D4; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:21:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:14:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:43:38 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24955 Archived-At: > Why? There's no need to autosave the buffer in which we show > messages, and the buffer where the whole collection is held, if it's > modified, will be autosaved by the usual machinery. What am I > missing? The buffer where the `mbox' is held doesn't have a buffer-file-name (the view buffer has buffer-file-name set instead, so without write-region-annotate-functions, the autosave file contains the currently shown message rather than a copy of the mbox). Stefan