From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7534: what about committing the patch also to emacs-23? Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:40:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296832042 30025 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2011 15:07:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , 7534@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 04 16:07:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlNFG-0006BV-QS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:07:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlNF1-0007vt-1f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38928 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlNEb-0007hM-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlNEY-0007WR-Tp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:06:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlNEY-0007WN-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlMhe-0005K1-5c; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7534 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7534-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7534.129682992120450 (code B ref 7534); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2011 14:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlMhd-0005Jn-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:32:01 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlMhb-0005Jb-89 for 7534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:31:59 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAFeeS01MCqAf/2dsb2JhbAClLHS5N4VaBIR6jx0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,426,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="90568124" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-31.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.160.31]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Feb 2011 09:40:29 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 57C54660DC; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:54:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:32:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43929 Archived-At: > Given that the patch for this bug was tiny and inoffensive, what do > you think about commiting it also in the emacs-23 branch (before the > 23.3 release)? We expect to be able to ship 23.3 *real soon now*, so we only want to commit there fixes for regressions now. Stefan