From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8415: 23.3.50; Extensible Emacs Registers Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:50:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4D9A45CD.4030808@gmail.com> <4D9A7537.5030005@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302012452 29417 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2011 14:07:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Davis Herring , Daniel Colascione , 8415@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 16:07:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76uj-0003bc-IO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:07:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q76ug-0007xp-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42898 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q76ub-0007xa-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76uZ-00042C-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76uZ-000420-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76es-0001Rl-3H; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8415 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 8415-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8415.13020114255513 (code B ref 8415); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8415) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2011 13:50:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76eH-0001Qs-62 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:50:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q76eE-0001Qf-Tl for 8415@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:50:24 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGcdm01FpZU1/2dsb2JhbAClaHiIebovhWsElkY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,304,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="103269377" Original-Received: from 69-165-149-53.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.149.53]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Apr 2011 09:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9C55558C65; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:50:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:42:20 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:51:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45639 Archived-At: >> The end point is pretty much the same, but all the intermediate steps >> are safe and easy to check. > I think a structure still is a better approach. I already agreed in the previous message. Stefan