From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:11:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871ucsjdl1.fsf@jidanni.org> <87liazyzz6.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360336331 3387 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2013 15:12:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13649@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 16:12:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pcs-0003G5-PP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:12:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48964 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pcZ-0007rR-QX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pcO-0007hR-Av for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pcN-0007rs-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:12:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pcN-0007re-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pcQ-0000ZH-4M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13649.13603363052158 (code B ref 13649); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2013 15:11:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44366 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pc9-0000Yl-Ak for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:11:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:36791) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pc7-0000Ye-LX for 13649@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:11:43 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZnt/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZnt/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="770844" Original-Received: from 69-165-153-237.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.153.237]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Feb 2013 10:11:39 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0C74759042; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:11:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87liazyzz6.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:25:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70888 Archived-At: >> A command is running in the default buffer. Use a new buffer? (yes or no) >> Which is a boobytrapped question, as picking "no" will always end up >> in failure... > Ah, to you "no" means "don't use a new buffer"? Yes, this is too ambiguous. > A better question would be: > A command is running in the default buffer. Run in a new buffer? > (yes or no) I think it's got the same problem. I think the question should be more something like: A command is running in the default buffer. Kill it or use a new buffer? with C-g being the answer for "don't use a new buffer and don't kill it". Stefan