From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:26:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <86lez73auf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86y236vlfm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86zgnms469.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39927"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, Eli Zaretskii , Gregory Heytings , 51883@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 23 22:27:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkOD-000AAc-Dd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:27:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkOC-0007Lu-7w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkO6-0007Ll-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkO5-0006o6-Sk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkO5-0000Jf-Px for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.16429731921176 (code B ref 51883); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2022 21:26:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkNb-0000Iu-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:26:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:64029) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkNZ-0000Ih-UP for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:26:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4B101442787; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:26:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0A0BC442785; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:26:23 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642973183; bh=/pScXefLZ5nnzHmG27rOkS7kSfKKAGehmwDj9aOmOPU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=InXiL+DpZgKqtM9jCA+6n5u44pFDwTjBkRL+Nzcxv5fl3scYAViseci2XDN/HdVGR VA8TWRJd56x5a7GWza4xXwflPLMoGxniNOsBh5xLR73l7QKWuXOOs+I0VwwvlBKdJd 8kUvfEMmSHDOOMJOgnjRqor2takXY/rGCTPZKhapabijSYCmNBeW2DqQ+PJ7JZQSpV xr1h0BATD7fbfEcNxxGzm35jydoRBhpUHY4N7bYxXJVcZzeoFQs2oCJjj4eocUW5Hh dzaEB9ye0mpVMFgTzE3mquFQKECnUTlibJ9+vy2r2jrAjysijWjaZeSR2h45BVpnd+ DS3oilbN8xkig== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B96621207C1; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:26:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86zgnms469.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:12:22 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224971 Archived-At: > I didn't mean to keep actual frames around. I thought about keeping > only the same data that is used by `clone-frame` to make a new frame > identical to the original frame. In case of `undelete-frame` this data > can be used to make a frame identical to the deleted frame. > I.e. a lightweight version of framesets, that avoids loading frameset.el. > This mostly means that after deleting the frame, only frame parameters > are kept from garbage collection, that later can be reused when making > a new frame on undeletion. Ah, got it, thanks. Then fully agreed. I was heading in the same direction when I suggested to try and use as little as possible of `frameset.el` and move the resulting code to `frame.el`. Stefan