From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15108: [Patch] Updated package dependencies Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:30:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386873080 25840 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2013 18:31:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15108@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tom Willemse Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 12 19:31:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB2f-00072e-5Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:31:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38107 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB2e-0002fB-Ne for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:31:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB2U-0002eq-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB2M-0003iC-KS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB2M-0003i8-HN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB2M-0003LB-23 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15108 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15108-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15108.138687302512789 (code B ref 15108); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15108) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2013 18:30:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB1j-0003K9-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:43923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB1d-0003Jo-9G for 15108@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBCIUDgv000649; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2BBCEAE350; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:30:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Tom Willemse's message of "Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:29:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4790=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4790> : inlines <316> : streams <1089724> : uri <1622043> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81831 Archived-At: > I've tested it most recently bzr trunk revision 115470. All the ways to > specify dependencies work as described before: Looks good, just one nitpick: > ;; Package-Requires: foo > ;; Package-Requires: (foo bar) > ;; Package-Requires: (foo (baz "1.1.0") bar) > ;; Package-Requires: (baz "1.1.0") Please don't support the first form nor the last form, since it otherwise gives the impression that ;; Package-Requires: foo bar baz or ;; Package-Requires: (foo "0.1") (bar "2.0") will also work and we don't want to go that way. Stefan