From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6950: Invisible parts and editing - reveal them? Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:00:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283444702 1910 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2010 16:25:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 02 18:24:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrCau-0001cs-DG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:24:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrCWR-0006OZ-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53190 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrCMN-0001IA-NW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:09:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrCMJ-0007fV-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrCMJ-0007et-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrC2A-00054V-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:49:02 -0400 Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 6950 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 6950@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA Original-Received: via spool by 6950-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D6950.128344249619473 (code D ref 6950); Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6950-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2010 15:48:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrC1P-000542-DY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or7VT-0001rn-9q for 6950-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-35.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.35]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o82B0dN3029362; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:00:39 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5C4B5660DF; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:00:37 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:28:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3613=0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:48:13 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:49:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39907 Archived-At: > Eh, sorry, you are right. reveal-mode takes care of this. I thought I > had it on, but for some reason I had commented it out. Good, so I can close the bug. > by default. That it is on by default seems good. What is the reason > reveal-mode is not on by default? (I have a feeling there was some > small problem, but I can't remember now.) I suspect it could take some more work to make it robust enough to be ON by default. But I encourage everyone to (global-reveal-mode 1) in their .emacs and post patches for the problems they encounter. Stefan