From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11073: 24.0.94; BIDI-related crash in redisplay with certain byte sequences Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:34:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sjgzvb6w.fsf@gnu.org> <83mx77v6jz.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwczux5q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332524120 31780 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2012 17:35:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11073@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 18:35:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8OU-0001yD-VO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:35:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8OU-0003U7-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55349) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8ON-0003SZ-Vw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8OM-0007ke-A6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8OM-0007kU-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8sE-00074M-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11073.133252596027167 (code B ref 11073); Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2012 18:06:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35673 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8sC-000747-3J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:12586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8rs-00073e-91 for 11073@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:05:59 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9FpYqr/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="169730601" Original-Received: from 69-165-138-171.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.138.171]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Mar 2012 13:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3E0A858EA2; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:34:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83fwczux5q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:58:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58027 Archived-At: > They are not equivalent when conversion of the multibyte form into a > character unifies a CJK character that is represented by a codepoint > from one of the private use areas. Why do we need this unification? Or rather, why do we need multiple codepoints, which then forces us to unify them? Stefan