From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16797: 24.3.50; `emacs-lisp-mode' does not derive from `lisp-mode' Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:25:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392819974 13650 80.91.229.3 (19 Feb 2014 14:26:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16797@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 19 15:26:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WG86M-0003DG-0u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:26:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG86L-0004BD-Ht for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:26:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG86C-0004AL-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG866-0002pc-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG866-0002pW-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WG865-00066x-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16797 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16797-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16797.139281992023423 (code B ref 16797); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16797) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2014 14:25:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WG85P-00065d-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:25:19 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:8466) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WG85L-00065N-FD for 16797@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:25:16 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/8D/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kE4gLBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/8D/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kE4gLBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="48133431" Original-Received: from 75-119-255-3.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.255.3]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Feb 2014 09:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8F3B96138C; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:25:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:13:10 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85884 Archived-At: > This is as much a question as a bug report, but this seems a better > place to ask it than emacs-devel@gnu.org: > Why is `emacs-lisp-mode' derived from `prog-mode' and not `lisp-mode'? Hysterical raisins? We could/should probably restructure it a bit, with a common ancestor `lisp-mode' and then have scheme-mode, emacs-lisp-mode, and common-lisp-mode derive from it. Patch welcome (after the unfreeze), Stefan