From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1077: bug#670: bug#1077: 23.0.60; x-create-frame: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:43:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <003e01c9257c$a385d800$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <009701c9263f$9cce7120$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000001c94cc1$e10e9c40$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <8F1F8998D60341099C4204B7BDD8AD4F@us.oracle.com> <96BC00F728B94AC18A15EA95B66C5248@us.oracle.com> <83zksv5g7j.fsf@gnu.org> <0A475933984F4CDA855D91C8B7639E3B@us.oracle.com> <83fwum5xzk.fsf@gnu.org> <9F24875655894485A414CD785D95725B@us.oracle.com> <83bp595od5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290977120 30356 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2010 20:45:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1077@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 28 21:45:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMo7U-00048j-DH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:45:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58906 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMo7T-0007I4-Rz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:45:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60481 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMo7F-0007Bh-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMo7D-0002iC-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMo7D-0002i7-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:44:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMo1V-00078j-Ve; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:39:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1077 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 1077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1077.129097669827397 (code B ref 1077); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2010 20:38:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMo0n-00077q-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMo0m-00077e-0x for 1077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:38:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oASKhk9t031247; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:43:46 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 568C4A85F1; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:43:45 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:42:50 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3693=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:39:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41982 Archived-At: > I understand that. But I'm not clear on how the backtrace stack is > constructed. If the error occurs in `<' (Lisp), then shouldn't Lisp > know what the _Lisp_ caller of Lisp `<' was? (You've already > mentioned, I think, that C doesn't return control to Lisp > `<' directly.) The Elisp backtrace only keeps track of Elisp function calls, so if the C code runs a chunk of code via `eval' rather than via `funcall', there is no function name pushed on the Elisp backtrace :-( Stefan