From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7802: bug #7802: 24.0.50; Extraneous `mouse-3' event when do `double-mouse-3' Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:03:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6AF23E536D254FC88C35DA0BEC775C1A@us.oracle.com> <7EB632A3268149CA89DA1D58C8046A01@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294464253 32499 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2011 05:24:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 05:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7802@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 06:24:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbRHc-0007To-AQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 06:24:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PbRHb-00070f-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60261 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PbRHU-00070Z-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:24:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PbRHT-0001pJ-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:24:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PbRHT-0001pF-HT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:23:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbQrN-0006aa-OX; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7802 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7802-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7802.129446260025295 (code B ref 7802); Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7802) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2011 04:56:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbQr1-0006Zv-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:56:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbQqz-0006Zh-VK; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:56:38 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAIZ/J01FxIbi/2dsb2JhbACkPnS7eYVMBIRnjiQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,292,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="87368285" Original-Received: from 69-196-134-226.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.134.226]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Jan 2011 00:03:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 94B6058B68; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:03:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:38:25 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:57:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43207 Archived-At: > Sounds to me like this "design" is just a side effect of the implementation. That might be the case. There is a "design" argument in favor of this behavior, tho, which is that otherwise we'd have to wait after a click before running its command, to check whether it was the first part of a double-click or not. Of course, we could try and only perform this waiting in the case where there is a double-click binding, thus minimizing such undesirable delays, but it still might lead to undesirable delays giving the impression the system is somewhat unresponsive. Stefan PS: Of course, the same holds for double-vs-triple clicks, tho it's largely irrelevant.