From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7865: Bug in display-buffer-reuse-frames [was Re: bug#7865: 24.0.50; doc of display-buffer-reuse-frames] Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:00:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7505A1C76F6C42E4A27159D548366974@us.oracle.com> <87aai1x8lf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4D57E530.1080101@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297706802 22211 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2011 18:06:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7865@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 19:06:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp2om-0000Jx-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:06:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46773 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp2ol-0006EF-8J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:06:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55937 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp2oe-00068W-HO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:06:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp2oc-0004sn-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp2oc-0004sa-N8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:06:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp2ag-0003os-LW; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7865.129770586914609 (code B ref 7865); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2011 17:51:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp2Zo-0003na-Uk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp2Zn-0003nO-DJ for 7865@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:51:08 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADP8WE1MCqmX/2dsb2JhbACmCnS7U4VeBIUEjzk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,469,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="91693506" Original-Received: from 76-10-169-151.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.169.151]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 Feb 2011 13:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 66B0F66188; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:00:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D57E530.1080101@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:05:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:52:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44119 Archived-At: >> Currently, if display-buffer-reuse-frames and pop-up-frames are both t, >> `C-x b' instead displays the buffer in the existing frame. So >> `pop-up-frames' has changed the behavior, even though it's not doing any >> "popping up" in this case. > I suppose you mean "if `display-buffer-reuse-frames' is nil and > `pop-up-frames' is t" in the first sentence above. In that case I'd > agree. I'm confused here. Which case are we talking about, which behavior is not desired, and which alternative behavior would you(plural) prefer? Stefan