From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#411: 23.0.60; flet and byte-compilation Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wsh1x95k.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <23ej28dodn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <9v390vz44p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351691918 28601 80.91.229.3 (31 Oct 2012 13:58:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:58:38 +0000 (UTC) To: 411@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 31 14:58:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYoh-0001OW-IS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:58:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYoZ-0008CO-12 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYoQ-0008Bq-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYoL-0005ZU-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYoL-0005ZO-0l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYqr-0002bl-QT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:01:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 411 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 411-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B411.135169205010006 (code B ref 411); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 411) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2012 14:00:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYqf-0002bL-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:00:50 -0400 Original-Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:32194) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTYqe-0002bE-6h for 411@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([24.201.208.110]) by VL-VM-MR004.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MCR00LRDG4YLW00@VL-VM-MR004.ip.videotron.ca> for 411@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CD8CF660E0; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:58:07 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <9v390vz44p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66274 Archived-At: > It seems to work (somehow) with the new hotness cl-lib and cl-flet > rather than the old and busted cl and flet. Indeed, because `cl-flet' is a different beast, much more like `labels' than like CL's `flet' (it is lexically scoped). Stefan