From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12852: 24.2; `exit-function' not supported in completion table's metadata alist Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353643129 586 80.91.229.3 (23 Nov 2012 03:58:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12852@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 23 04:58:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkPm-0001F2-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 04:58:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkPc-0000in-3Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkPY-0000iQ-Nk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkPX-0008Ea-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkPX-0008EU-JY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkQt-0005pz-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:00:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 04:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12852 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12852.135364318822383 (code B ref 12852); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 04:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2012 03:59:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkQd-0005ow-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:59:48 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:29694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbkQa-0005ok-Vy; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:59:45 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FpaQ6/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSQuh24FugmQRAOIQppxgViDB4E4Gg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="208276405" Original-Received: from 69-165-164-58.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.164.58]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Nov 2012 22:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A70B4597C9; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:58:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:22:33 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67331 Archived-At: >> I mean I might be subverting the exit-function. Any suggestions? > Any comments on what is the best thing to do? Clearly, with the current code base, adding "." is the easiest solution. You can also strip any final dot in the user's input, so the odd final dot is only a temporary artifact in the minibuffer. But you do have some good points about exit-function, which might justify redesigning it, or providing some similar functionality in completion-metadata. But I need to think more about what that should look like. Stefan