From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51766: string-pixel-width limitations Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:49:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mtmalrs1.fsf@localhost> <837dde200c.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0helmig.fsf@localhost> <831r3m1tpk.fsf@gnu.org> <8735o1r31q.fsf@localhost> <834k8hzi10.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgq9pmb6.fsf@localhost> <831r3lzfk4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnldpk5x.fsf@localhost> <83zgq9xv1y.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1bkpgjw.fsf@localhost> <87y1xv7ggf.fsf@localhost> <838rpvpns3.fsf@gnu.org> <8735fyslgq.fsf@localhost> <83fsjyl3sz.fsf@gnu.org> <87r13iqo19.fsf@localhost> <834k0eky7h.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6a6qjgx.fsf@localhost> <83y1xqji8z.fsf@gnu.org> <874k0eqic0.fsf@localhost> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18346"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 51766@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 01:50:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6z-0004e4-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:50:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38474 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6y-0001Fp-IX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6k-0001E0-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6k-0005P8-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6k-0004Y8-9K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 23:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51766 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51766-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51766.165594180017471 (code B ref 51766); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 23:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51766) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2022 23:50:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6h-0004Xj-U2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:50:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37077) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4A6d-0004XT-5q for 51766@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6D9DB1003CC; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:49:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CFF9D1001D2; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:49:47 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1655941787; bh=AoQcocZdhyohR5liNle22P+iN8FETyJUrUy6/NmfZHA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=OT6aerOcJCOKtf7pKeiyEyl0j+K++IrbUg/jze2GqFARlYBatb0cxEuXqeTYqG999 cbVfHVP608bWDruAlR5E24nuUX9517UAeaww+W/0e2OoEuqL6CCSt7k/u+IwjrXy9t hrPZR/vS7AZkVegnHbiCgNf2OnVkkRXEoaBlWfJq0vJCwlfDR/IIxzRtOJNble5uZe hakAuR6PGiI1xrP33DUWquNCQ9DB1WLpsV0HUUo3PvS8ssJk+vRcGy8BFQXqESRqOu Apns667i7LnU7oGo/X69T3zuN3g6AfKJ4O5bIXLD9HGbytuQcCzBjNive/Q1mkKhRK 7pTkmm7+lK4pg== Original-Received: from alfajor (196.214.25.93.rev.sfr.net [93.25.214.196]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06F8F120377; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 19:49:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874k0eqic0.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:03:43 +0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:235057 Archived-At: > 1. Org has a real issue with bad third-party code inhibiting > before/after-change function + modifications in indirect buffers not > always triggering before/after-change > 2. Because the issue is critical and can cause data corruption, we > cannot just ignore it The bug is not yours. You don't have to ignore it, but you don't have to fix it either. > - The suggestion to compare buffer size is helpful, but not 100% > reliable To the extent that this just helps to detect other people's bug, I don't think it needs to be 100%. Stefan