From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pqe8kbg1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83pqe823oj.fsf@gnu.org> <87vco0ivb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ehugajy7.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327974422 12581 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2012 01:47:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, ding@gnus.org To: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 02:46:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2oA-00027t-9L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:46:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46584 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2o9-0006at-Kc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2o7-0006ao-24 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2o6-0007Rv-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2o6-0007Rr-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2oI-0004su-3C; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed X-Debbugs-Original-To: bugs@gnus.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, Ted Zlatanov , schwab@linux-m68k.org, ding@gnus.org Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.132797438918734 (code B ref 10238); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 01:46:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2nl-0004s7-DN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:29 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:35607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs2ni-0004rt-UO for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:27 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAA1HJ09MCqD0/2dsb2JhbABDrlaBBoFyAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDYgzuQuLKRICAgMGAgQCAQQCAgwGCgMBhB0BBAQMDAIhgxwEiD+ac4RX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,592,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="160382532" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-244.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.244]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Jan 2012 20:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C60A259470; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ehugajy7.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:45:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56274 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81036 Archived-At: >> I think we should try to keep it under 80, and if it has to go over, the >> essential information should be before the 80th char. But forcing it to >> 80 will force us to write convoluted summaries that misrepresent the >> commit for the sake of saving a few characters. > I think it's fine for the summary line to not describe the entire patch. Actually, the way to think about this is that this "summary" is really about giving a *name* to the patch. In this context, 80chars is usually not that restrictive (although often a large part is taken by some kind of context like "lisp/emacs-lisp/tabulated-list.el: ", that still leaves 40chars for the "name-in-context"). Stefan