From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:56:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334105826 6652 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2012 00:57:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 02:57:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlrs-0002Fe-9o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:57:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlrr-0003tw-P7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlro-0003to-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlrn-00080G-7t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlrn-000805-4M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlso-0008Nx-0G; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.133410582832166 (code B ref 9243); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 00:57:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlrw-0008Mk-Gc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:14299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHlru-0008Mc-RW for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:57:07 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk+4rwGW/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFtjKLYYR5BJZ9jUiBXYMD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="173172334" Original-Received: from 184-175-1-150.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.1.150]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Apr 2012 20:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AEB9059460; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:56:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:19:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58742 Archived-At: > Anyway, looking over this bug report, I'm not sure we really got > anywhere with the main issue here. Are you still seeing these > discrepancies in article numbers? Oh, yes. Actually, I now see something similar with comp.lang.ml accessed via NNTP (additionally to the spam folder accessed over imap). Stefan